Homepage / Employer / Working environment / Organizing working environment / Risk Assessment (Risk Evaluation and Supervision)
Measuring the Working Environment Hazards
For many hazards it is known in which extent they are harmful to health. Other factors appear in the working environment only periodically; thus, the singular factor mapping might not often suffice. The best solution would be to monitor the factors (constant surveillance during a certain time period). It could be complicated but still feasible for many hazard factors, and not always extremely expensive.
Sometimes, the effect becomes evident only then, when the employee’s organism has received a certain dose from contact with the hazard. In this case, it is wiser to measure the dose that the employee has received. The most common method, for employees who come in contact with ionizing radiation, are radiation monitors that change their colour depending on the total radiation or the received radiation dose. The dose of several chemicals (chemicals that exit the organism very slowly and could build up and have an effect) can be determined in a similar way. It is also possible to measure the noise affecting the employees. Monitoring is justified by the fact that a single measurement in a certain part of the room might not comprise all workplaces (rooms) nor all work stages. Thus, there is a danger that some events and accompanying factors are not properly evaluated. It is also possible that other factors occurred accidentally only during the measuring, which could make them over-estimated.
In general, measurements are objective – but only if the measuring methodology is precisely described and strictly followed. According to the Metrology Act, results must be proven and traceable – meaning that a measuring carried out like described in the measuring protocol will always give an identical result (within the admissible deviation). Therefore, both measuring (that presupposes familiarity with the phenomenon and measurement devices and methodologies) and recording the results requires competence. The practice that “if there is a device, anyone can do the measurements” cannot be considered sensible. Often, the device is not that important as it is to know and follow the procedure rules.
Find your working environment measurer among the service providers.
Sometimes, the workplace factors can be measured indirectly. The easiest example here is chronometry where the number of certain movements in a certain time period are counted – even though the aim is to evaluate the workload on certain muscles.
The following list of explanations help to “measure” whether a sitting (as most people work on a computer) working position could become a problem or not.
We are committed to making this website accessible to as many people as possible.
Found keywords